From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: How do I determine the argument type... Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 10:07:16 +1000 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87ptmfx0i3.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <3EBC71BF.B2264C7@veritas.com> <874r3t5o1f.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <3EC6A6CA.94855664@veritas.com> <87of213tk0.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1053302830 18093 80.91.224.249 (19 May 2003 00:07:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 00:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 19 02:07:08 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19HYBI-0004hV-00 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 02:07:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19HYCl-0001eP-00 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 May 2003 20:08:39 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19HYC4-0000tT-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 May 2003 20:07:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19HYBt-0000Wz-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 May 2003 20:07:48 -0400 Original-Received: from snoopy.pacific.net.au ([61.8.0.36]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19HYBk-0000DG-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 May 2003 20:07:37 -0400 Original-Received: from sunny.pacific.net.au (sunny.pacific.net.au [203.2.228.40]) h4J07Xxh004294 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:07:34 +1000 Original-Received: from wisma.pacific.net.au (wisma.pacific.net.au [210.23.129.72]) by sunny.pacific.net.au with ESMTP id h4J07XQg006602 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:07:33 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp34.dyn228.pacific.net.au [203.143.228.34]) by wisma.pacific.net.au (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4J07WYZ024940 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:07:32 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19HYBS-0000dW-00; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:07:18 +1000 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87of213tk0.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> (Marius Vollmer's message of "18 May 2003 03:57:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2404 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2404 Marius Vollmer writes: > > Ahh, I see. Yes, it was not a good thing to change gh_new2str that > way. I'm not sure what to do about this. Changing this back is just > as bad as the original change from int to size_t. The manual still says "int". Maybe call it a bug fix and put it back to that. Or making it a macro could hide the variation for plain calls, which is presumably most usages. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel