From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Stack unwinding for C code Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:23:58 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87ptdrxopd.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <87y8sz5kio.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87ptea40wu.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87brppkft6.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <3FF559C8.2040702@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de> <871xqil089.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <3FFFE5F6.4080108@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1073784396 16428 80.91.224.253 (11 Jan 2004 01:26:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 11 02:26:29 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AfUN2-0002zW-00 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:26:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AfVJQ-0004gW-Q1 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:26:48 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AfVIl-0004d5-2q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:26:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AfVIB-00044S-MW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.253.8.218] (helo=mail.dokom.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AfVI9-000434-AL for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:25:29 -0500 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway15.dip81.dokom.de ([195.253.15.81] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by mail.dokom.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #3) id 1AfULH-0004VF-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:24:40 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 14013 invoked by uid 1000); 11 Jan 2004 01:23:58 -0000 Original-To: Dirk Herrmann In-Reply-To: <3FFFE5F6.4080108@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de> (Dirk Herrmann's message of "Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:45:58 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3193 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3193 Dirk Herrmann writes: >>The first variant (with scm_prevent_rewind) would be more elegant from >>an implementational point of view. The latter (with >>SCM_F_REWINDABLE_FRAME) leads to a more desirable default behavior. I >>think people should explicitely allow rewinding when they have unwind >>handlers. >> > Hmm, probably I am missing something, but wouldn't it just be possible > to make the non-rewindable frame the default, and offer > scm_allow_rewind as a function then? Yes, that would be possible, but the flags variant is OK, too, no? > [...] Maybe we should first wait what kinds of cleanup functions we > detect to be useful within guile and then decide about this issue. Yes. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel