From: Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au>
Subject: Re: real == frac
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:09:23 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ptcevcyk.fsf@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87u14xphf4.fsf@zip.com.au
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 392 bytes --]
* numbers.c (scm_num_eq_p): For real==frac, complex==frac, frac==real
and frac==complex, make an exact comparison rather than converting
with fraction2double.
I've added code under the complex cases because it was there already.
But I might have mentioned before that I thought all those could be
false immediately, if COMPLEXP always has a non-zero imaginary part.
[-- Attachment #2: numbers.c.eq-frac.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2650 bytes --]
--- numbers.c.~1.221.~ 2004-01-07 07:54:59.000000000 +1000
+++ numbers.c 2004-02-12 11:58:18.000000000 +1000
@@ -2945,6 +2945,7 @@
SCM
scm_num_eq_p (SCM x, SCM y)
{
+ again:
if (SCM_INUMP (x))
{
long xx = SCM_INUM (x);
@@ -3019,7 +3020,15 @@
return SCM_BOOL ((SCM_REAL_VALUE (x) == SCM_COMPLEX_REAL (y))
&& (0.0 == SCM_COMPLEX_IMAG (y)));
else if (SCM_FRACTIONP (y))
- return SCM_BOOL (SCM_REAL_VALUE (x) == scm_i_fraction2double (y));
+ {
+ double xx = SCM_REAL_VALUE (x);
+ if (xisnan (xx))
+ return SCM_BOOL_F;
+ if (xisinf (xx))
+ return SCM_BOOL (xx < 0.0);
+ x = scm_inexact_to_exact (x); /* with x as frac or int */
+ goto again;
+ }
else
SCM_WTA_DISPATCH_2 (g_eq_p, x, y, SCM_ARGn, s_eq_p);
}
@@ -3046,8 +3055,18 @@
return SCM_BOOL ((SCM_COMPLEX_REAL (x) == SCM_COMPLEX_REAL (y))
&& (SCM_COMPLEX_IMAG (x) == SCM_COMPLEX_IMAG (y)));
else if (SCM_FRACTIONP (y))
- return SCM_BOOL ((SCM_COMPLEX_REAL (x) == scm_i_fraction2double (y))
- && (SCM_COMPLEX_IMAG (x) == 0.0));
+ {
+ double xx;
+ if (SCM_COMPLEX_IMAG (x) != 0.0)
+ return SCM_BOOL_F;
+ xx = SCM_COMPLEX_REAL (x);
+ if (xisnan (xx))
+ return SCM_BOOL_F;
+ if (xisinf (xx))
+ return SCM_BOOL (xx < 0.0);
+ x = scm_inexact_to_exact (x); /* with x as frac or int */
+ goto again;
+ }
else
SCM_WTA_DISPATCH_2 (g_eq_p, x, y, SCM_ARGn, s_eq_p);
}
@@ -3058,10 +3077,28 @@
else if (SCM_BIGP (y))
return SCM_BOOL_F;
else if (SCM_REALP (y))
- return SCM_BOOL (scm_i_fraction2double (x) == SCM_REAL_VALUE (y));
+ {
+ double yy = SCM_REAL_VALUE (y);
+ if (xisnan (yy))
+ return SCM_BOOL_F;
+ if (xisinf (yy))
+ return SCM_BOOL (0.0 < yy);
+ y = scm_inexact_to_exact (y); /* with y as frac or int */
+ goto again;
+ }
else if (SCM_COMPLEXP (y))
- return SCM_BOOL ((scm_i_fraction2double (x) == SCM_COMPLEX_REAL (y))
- && (0.0 == SCM_COMPLEX_IMAG (y)));
+ {
+ double yy;
+ if (SCM_COMPLEX_IMAG (y) != 0.0)
+ return SCM_BOOL_F;
+ yy = SCM_COMPLEX_REAL (y);
+ if (xisnan (yy))
+ return SCM_BOOL_F;
+ if (xisinf (yy))
+ return SCM_BOOL (0.0 < yy);
+ y = scm_inexact_to_exact (y); /* with y as frac or int */
+ goto again;
+ }
else if (SCM_FRACTIONP (y))
return scm_i_fraction_equalp (x, y);
else
[-- Attachment #3: numbers.test.eq-frac.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 935 bytes --]
--- numbers.test.~1.40.~ 2003-12-09 15:06:40.000000000 +1000
+++ numbers.test 2004-02-17 09:07:42.000000000 +1000
@@ -1308,7 +1308,25 @@
;; in gmp prior to 4.2, mpz_cmp_d ended up treating NaN as 3*2^1023, make
;; sure we've avoided that
(pass-if (not (= (ash 3 1023) +nan.0)))
- (pass-if (not (= +nan.0 (ash 3 1023)))))
+ (pass-if (not (= +nan.0 (ash 3 1023))))
+
+ (pass-if (= 1/2 0.5))
+ (pass-if (not (= 1/3 0.333333333333333333333333333333333)))
+ (pass-if (not (= 2/3 0.5)))
+ (pass-if (not (= 0.5 (+ 1/2 (/ 1 (ash 1 1000))))))
+
+ (pass-if (= 1/2 0.5+0i))
+ (pass-if (not (= 0.333333333333333333333333333333333 1/3)))
+ (pass-if (not (= 2/3 0.5+0i)))
+ (pass-if (not (= 1/2 0+0.5i)))
+
+ (pass-if (= 0.5 1/2))
+ (pass-if (not (= 0.5 2/3)))
+ (pass-if (not (= (+ 1/2 (/ 1 (ash 1 1000))) 0.5)))
+
+ (pass-if (= 0.5+0i 1/2))
+ (pass-if (not (= 0.5+0i 2/3)))
+ (pass-if (not (= 0+0.5i 1/2))))
;;;
;;; <
[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 142 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-16 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-21 20:58 real == frac Kevin Ryde
2003-11-30 1:31 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-12-09 20:34 ` Kevin Ryde
2004-02-16 23:09 ` Kevin Ryde [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ptcevcyk.fsf@zip.com.au \
--to=user42@zip.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).