From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] `any' and `every' in `(oop goops util)' Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 06:38:53 +1000 Message-ID: <87pspybo6a.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <87psq0pmyy.fsf@laas.fr> <87oe5k9dj1.fsf@zip.com.au> <87u0fbfgoe.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129927278 18657 80.91.229.2 (21 Oct 2005 20:41:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 21 22:41:16 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ET3fS-0005WZ-H4 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:39:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ET3fR-00033s-Nx for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:39:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ET3fO-00032T-Bs for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:39:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ET3fN-00031o-96 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:39:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ET3fN-00031d-0c for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.115] (helo=mailout2.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ET3fM-0007Xw-8g for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.86]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j9LKcvXi024768 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 06:38:57 +1000 Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2495.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.36.149]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j9LKcu15005215 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 06:38:57 +1000 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1ET3fC-0000gr-00; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 06:38:54 +1000 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87u0fbfgoe.fsf@laas.fr> (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s's?= message of "Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:54:57 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5342 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > > Kevin Ryde writes: > >> When using (oop goops) ? I'm not sure (oop goops util) is meant to be >> used outside the goops implementation. > > And what difference does/would it make? If you're not supposed to use it then any warnings it provokes when you do aren't a big deal :). Now that srfi-1 has a lot more C code it's probably worth using for performance. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel