From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Turning `scm_is_pair ()' into a macro Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:01:16 +0100 Organization: LAAS-CNRS Message-ID: <87psnxxswj.fsf@laas.fr> References: <87wti7pwie.fsf@laas.fr> <87ek4ftgge.fsf@zagadka.de> <87fyouitqo.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134745745 28692 80.91.229.2 (16 Dec 2005 15:09:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 16 16:09:03 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnH9E-0002Rt-2u for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:05:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnH9u-0000uD-AU for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:06:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EnD6c-0001Cy-0T for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:46:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EnClb-0007iJ-65 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:24:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnCQC-0005bS-IJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:02:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.93.0.15] (helo=laas.laas.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1EnCSb-00047N-7I for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:05:09 -0500 Original-Received: by laas.laas.fr (8.13.1/8.13.4) with SMTP id jBGA1s3L004227; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:01:55 +0100 (CET) Original-To: hanwen@xs4all.nl X-URL: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 26 Frimaire an 214 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu Mail-Followup-To: hanwen@xs4all.nl, guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:08:13 +0000 (UTC)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at CNRS-LAAS X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5533 Archived-At: hanwen@byrd.xs4all.nl (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes: > Yes, Just Do It :-) Since, I consider compilers that don't support inlining unimportant, I'd happily live without the `inline.c' stuff. I.e., I'd put this in `pairs.h': static SCM_C_INLINE int scm_is_pair (...) With compilers not supporting inlining, this would lead to the creation of several instances of the function. But who cares? Marius? Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel