From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Default stack limit Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:58:22 +1000 Message-ID: <87psil5t5t.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <3E76C952D0DE7C18F2E3A89F@cadabra-sw.stanford.edu> <87acatj19q.fsf@laas.fr> <87hd5111mz.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <8656DB86D246C1D9ACD84549@tribes2.stanford.edu> <87zmirvoew.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <20060505140534.GA13293@bordell.redhat.usu> <20060506111221.GA16844@bordell.redhat.usu> <87slnljzgj.fsf@minimini.mvo.home> <1147084130.23680.94.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87k68wjib9.fsf@minimini.mvo.home> <87y7xbn15u.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <1147181025.23680.99.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87bqu6kext.fsf_-_@minimini.mvo.home> <1147271464.23680.140.camel@localhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147305821 12112 80.91.229.2 (11 May 2006 00:03:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 11 02:03:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FdyeU-0007tX-6n for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:03:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FdyeT-0002JU-JF for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:03:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FdyeQ-0002JJ-M6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:03:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FdyeP-0002Iy-4v for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:03:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FdyeO-0002Iv-WC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:03:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.115] (helo=mailout2.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fdyb2-0004g3-SD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:00:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.87]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4E66EB3D; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:58:29 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2388.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.35.136]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k4ANwRek006607; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:58:27 +1000 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FdyZS-0003wr-00; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:58:22 +1000 Original-To: Andy Wingo Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <1147271464.23680.140.camel@localhost.localdomain> (Andy Wingo's message of "Wed, 10 May 2006 16:31:04 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5921 Archived-At: Andy Wingo writes: > > Is it just the compilers that changed, Seems to be, it's still fine with for instance gcc 2.95 unoptimized. gcc 4 seems to use up a lot more stack in CEVAL()/DEVAL() when unoptimized, something like 900 bytes for me, but why that's so I couldn't tell. (Keeping stack usage in that func to a minimum would probably be a good thing in general though, as the main recursion when interpreting ...) _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel