From: Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Guile + Boehm GC: First Remarks
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:01:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pshsqvcm.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5lf78$min$2@sea.gmane.org> (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Thu, 1 Jun 2006 01:17:29 +0000 (UTC)")
lilydev@muurbloem.xs4all.nl (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes:
> Boehm is generational, AFAIK.
>
> Virtually everyone uses BGC. GCJ, MzScheme, BigLoog, GNU Obj-C, etc.
>
> See,
>
> http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/
>
> for a longer list.
Thanks; lots of interesting stuff there.
> By using BGC, you potentially loose a bit of performance, since BGC
> isn't specialized for LISP/Scheme, but you get a system that is much
> better overall researched and tuned.
I like the "better research" and the maintainability angles, but I
don't see how we can say that BGC is "better tuned" than Guile's own
GC, if current data shows it performing less well.
Perhaps we aren't yet running a truly representative set of benchmarks
though?
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-02 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-31 8:49 Guile + Boehm GC: First Remarks Ludovic Courtès
2006-05-31 20:11 ` Neil Jerram
2006-06-01 1:17 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2006-06-01 7:22 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-06-01 7:35 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2006-06-01 8:28 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-06-01 8:50 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2006-06-01 9:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-06-01 12:04 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-06-04 22:24 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2006-06-02 0:01 ` Neil Jerram [this message]
2006-06-02 8:06 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2006-06-01 7:55 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-06-02 0:07 ` Neil Jerram
2006-06-02 12:41 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-10-15 0:04 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2006-10-16 7:46 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-10-18 11:21 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2006-10-19 14:25 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-10-25 18:47 ` Neil Jerram
2006-10-18 11:34 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2006-10-19 14:28 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-10-18 14:42 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2006-11-26 18:48 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-10-18 14:59 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2006-10-18 15:42 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2006-10-18 16:10 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2006-10-18 16:53 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2006-06-01 1:10 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2006-06-01 8:09 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-06-18 18:00 ` Clinton Ebadi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pshsqvcm.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net \
--to=neil@ossau.uklinux.net \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).