From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Terrific Dead Lock Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:20:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87prtriv9j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8763vq6yvv.fsf@gnu.org> <87y78lioxa.fsf@gnu.org> <87k5k1c4zm.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205875376 8711 80.91.229.12 (18 Mar 2008 21:22:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:22:56 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 18 22:23:25 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JbjHI-0004gc-KX for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:23:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JbjGi-00038L-LF for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:22:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JbjF7-00023t-Nj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:21:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JbjF6-00023P-6b for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:21:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JbjF5-00023H-WE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JbjF5-0001NN-Ev for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JbjF2-00076o-5Y for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:21:04 +0000 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:21:04 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:21:04 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 29 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-Revolutionary-Date: 29 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vent=F4se?= an 216 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:m6JNqChJFTGrZR+IKCivDN7TkxQ= X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7083 Archived-At: Hi, Neil Jerram writes: > Basically yes, but two thoughts: > > - Can I just take a couple more days to review the srcprops changes in > detail? It's important for my debugging work, and I recall having > some concern when Han-Wen implemented this... Looking at the diffs > quickly again now, I can't see any reason for that concern, but I'd > like to be sure. Sure. (I browsed this thread recently and I think these were mainly efficiency concerns.) > - Although I agree in principle that all those macros shouldn't be in > srcprop.h, do we really need to make that change now? I think we can > just apply Han-Wen's changes to the macros in srcprop.h, without > moving them to srcprop.c. I dislike the idea of having to create another version of `srcprop' just for the sake of leaving private macros publicly accessible, but maybe I'm just too lazy or radical. FWIW, http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&q=+SRCPROPSP suggests that Guile may be the only user of this macro. Thanks, Ludovic.