From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: SCM_BOOL_F == 0 and BDW-GC Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:36:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87pr9li9ic.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k52uvhnt.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <20090702142823.GA1401@fibril.netris.org> <877hyqk8bx.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <20090703153218.GA1382@fibril.netris.org> <20090705024135.GA2363@fibril.netris.org> <20090707111406.GA1388@fibril.netris.org> <87iqg5y2o8.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <87zl9fps1m.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87iqfhgrjy.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87hbv11a04.fsf@gnu.org> <87zl8sc6yg.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87ab0pjzvv.fsf@gnu.org> <87bpl5ib1g.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1253482637 31863 80.91.229.12 (20 Sep 2009 21:37:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:37:17 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 20 23:37:10 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MpU5m-0001Ns-2U for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:37:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37521 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MpU5l-0007S8-IE for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:37:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MpU5a-0007PM-Cp for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:36:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MpU5V-0007L4-OR for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:36:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44103 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MpU5V-0007L1-JD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:36:53 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:39943) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MpU5V-0005JJ-3o for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:36:53 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MpU5S-0001Ib-Ip for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:36:50 +0200 Original-Received: from 78.251.23.100 ([78.251.23.100]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:36:50 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by 78.251.23.100 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:36:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.251.23.100 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Jour de la Raison de =?iso-8859-1?Q?l'Ann=E9e?= 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:q49VMPr6oBXq3glvrwqjn3KdogU= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9368 Archived-At: Hi! Neil Jerram writes: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> Neil Jerram writes: >> >>> So are you going to try out SCM_UNDEFINED == 0 ? >> >> Who, me? :-) >> >> I’ll add it to my to-do list and report back, then. > > I'm sorry, I didn't exactly mean that you _should_ add it to your list - > especially since I'm sure your list is already very long. What I should > have said is that it seems like something that someone could try out, > and that perhaps I could do that, but that I don't want to duplicate if > you're already planning to do it very soon. I’m not planning to do it soon, so I’m happy if someone else gives it a try. Thanks, Ludo’.