From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: What version of GMP should we require? Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:20:24 -0500 Message-ID: <87pqqhuquv.fsf@netris.org> References: <87y657wn54.fsf@netris.org> <871v2xw7at.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298578987 16859 80.91.229.12 (24 Feb 2011 20:23:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 24 21:23:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PshiH-00038E-9y for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:23:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48697 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PshiG-0006J6-Eb for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:23:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54433 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pshg6-0005Of-3R for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:20:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pshg5-0008Ix-0Q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:20:45 -0500 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([216.204.32.208]:51306) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pshg3-0008Hg-Qu; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:20:43 -0500 Original-Received: from c-98-217-70-13.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.217.70.13] helo=freedomincluded) by world.peace.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pshfn-0005YY-DS; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:20:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mhw by freedomincluded with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pshfl-0003yL-BB; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:20:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <871v2xw7at.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:39:54 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 216.204.32.208 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11704 Archived-At: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > For 2.0, what about AC_CHECK_LIB =E2=80=98mpz_rootrem=E2=80=99, and provi= de a > replacement when it=E2=80=99s not available? [...] Sounds reasonable. > In =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99 you can of course require 4.2 and clean thing= s up as you see > fit. :-) Great, thanks! :) Mark