From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Build Error in master Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:01:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87pqdzrkpt.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87sjj286g9.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328086903 21347 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2012 09:01:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 10:01:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsW4Q-0005Zu-IR for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:01:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48935 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsW4P-0005dw-0i for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:01:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58388) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsW4H-0005dG-QU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:01:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsW4B-0006lf-Om for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:01:29 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:65297 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsW4B-0006l9-L1 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:01:23 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7A86390; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 04:01:22 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+WltRwhR51NTxaWLyGs6hp5LmrU=; b=rOG/w6 pNrKFRjqpsa0pUzKlxVQUe7J9LY9uRWc9Sb5SaowVyaXW2PXOCBDDPGwbMsBRMU9 /YH1Vp1Jlpwbuge9AmG4Af/pOZa8IImSlQiKLKDA4yWTdMsB1alCrj6AefD0cIZN C8az3VI1Jb5xXCLoy+Pb5PYDuVyNnMRGPdzm0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=SqeDeD22npFQ5rT2Yb7oZmzocUYxfDyr faEjFxxCkhH9n8yfOtnw+Bf4kmfIJIMqKYDFI44TId2mQvAEhrDKBY/BewxZqYi5 VY/3RCFE4JGlcbzc+FsZiG31pOOvxDHzHgqgD7/MlsIaLXSQBmq35yHYKEcemq0Z AMPbIDtuC5g= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B9A638E; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 04:01:22 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [85.50.103.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 121C66384; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 04:01:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Noah Lavine's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:12:50 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4FF5532A-4CB3-11E1-B301-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:13769 Archived-At: On Wed 01 Feb 2012 03:12, Noah Lavine writes: > In the failing call, > the SCM 'symbols' is 0x10101cff0, but the failing set is at 0x304, > which has not been allocated. 0x304 is one of the iflags, SCM_EOL I think. So, I know it might not have anything to do with it, but can you verify that your guile includes patch 0aed71aa51e89e714de2392c2a5f44694dca77ea ? I just committed that last night, and although it does not seem to be related, who knows. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/