From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile 1.8 development Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 18:32:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87poi0dhrz.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87a895chxn.fsf@zigzag.favinet> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488389599 18063 195.159.176.226 (1 Mar 2017 17:33:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:33:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 01 18:33:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cj87d-0003RR-F6 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 18:33:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47901 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj87i-00032R-1B for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:33:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj87Z-00032J-Sy for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj87V-0004Em-OS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:33:01 -0500 Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:63142 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj87V-0004Eb-I5 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:32:57 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51136041C for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:32:56 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=h6FdBDjzcYBP n7xrhSlRHFT4msE=; b=fi0h1+6XlTas5uREzZ3R7vkqAEu3fxtDlJSkvMXkvM9Y UscEHU/UlFQmSDaGSn+jG7dobM0fJvmqKITe6Iz7oLgTULNvFuKY9ErKa00n+V6B SoiTL7+EmmSdvkkvjWVFhW0F5lJ+rscgYpSu/E2GtREqSj4MnhG1TkvjjA9/mC4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:subject :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=X8Zrri M/R6fhAsSXUeqKHN7F6QFcXJu8jxJs8UcWy40TYgUCl5XFH3xAhomJt2eMp+iToU Abc0NU0OQEHv+tGyG1Tb05u1NV2l6wf5/vr/tQIuT6lcyIYnyk4w1KXi45mWpTjL 4mzBwdGrPXgNMjzf4ljDg4ZxPIqALvvcP45CU= Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD64F6041B for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:32:56 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA76360418 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:32:55 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87a895chxn.fsf@zigzag.favinet> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Wed, 01 Mar 2017 13:14:44 +0100") X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1B35E718-FEA5-11E6-B553-B667064AB293-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.147.108.66 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18968 Archived-At: On Wed 01 Mar 2017 13:14, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > Which git branch is best for continued Guile 1.8 development? > I know most people have no interest in 1.8, that's fine, just > kindly humor this slow janitor w/ a normative answer, thanks. > > (I guess =E2=80=98branch_release-1-8=E2=80=99, but maybe someone knows be= tter.) Yep, branch_release-1-8. Happy hacking, Andy