From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix bug #24816: open-string-output-port extraction thunk does not truncate string port as expected by R6RS in Guile 2.1.7 Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 08:43:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87poi0azuh.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87fuiwdgqx.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488440602 31313 195.159.176.226 (2 Mar 2017 07:43:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 07:43:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Freja Nordsiek Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 02 08:43:16 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjLOM-0007Sq-Sv for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 08:43:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50843 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjLOS-0005Cu-Rw for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 02:43:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjLON-0005Cd-S9 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 02:43:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjLOK-0002ci-PZ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 02:43:15 -0500 Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.67]:60411 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjLOK-0002cY-LA for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 02:43:12 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06805681CC; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 02:43:12 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=/+fzWI026jCAboLYzuFcPbcuDug=; b=B80bkW pMkJAWkPlmyajLUfwwpCHtZbxQeTWjSmlXq8J3W+R9mlvryFzK2uE3AxtTXFMd5s dJQMDsBezGddbrzklIoft5uBrzEgv+353yKXRrpUJULBJFm+YFhtFRbdR0KFqfyq 6Gba1mG8IvwgO6uWnBZtP3q1PgRcPna5DM+Ac= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=KY3o3L7RYaMtW3UFIaChWbUEDNnE1I58 miZud1TrwEq6SuKh3615W2zO3aG4NRyPquyTCUbboL79pSCPuG5/BQlm8wPoc2BP 3oBvESS102Sx3iWaQKHYV+S09m0G2J1EWc3MUohqETbOUm59dK/lXmHX4McoTnl1 FoeIygLdfaQ= Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32BD681CB; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 02:43:11 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1AD8A681CA; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 02:43:10 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Freja Nordsiek's message of "Wed, 1 Mar 2017 22:15:52 +0100") X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E2B35AF2-FF1B-11E6-812F-85AB91A0D1B0-02397024!pb-sasl2.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.147.108.67 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18974 Archived-At: On Wed 01 Mar 2017 22:15, Freja Nordsiek writes: > By the way, I tested the method you used manually on 2.0.x today and > it fixed the discrepancy with R6RS there too. Might consider patching > that branch too. Hopefully no one has been depending on the > non-truncating behavior. Would you mind sending a patch? I would be happy to apply it :) Cheers, Andy