Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> writes:
> Jean Abou Samra schreef op wo 09-03-2022 om 00:31 [+0100]:
>> In summary, the less Guile optimizes, the faster LilyPond runs. Is that
>> something expected?
>
> I don't think so, but I don't have a clue how this happens ...

Do I understand it correctly that Lilypond has lots of snippets that are
executed exactly once? In that case it could be expected that the
overhead of optimization dominates — maybe even the overhead of
increased code-size from inlining?

Also the new baseline compiler is already pretty good:
https://wingolog.org/archives/2020/06/03/a-baseline-compiler-for-guile

Maybe this?

> There is also a felicitous feedback effect in that because the
> baseline compiler is much smaller than the CPS compiler, it takes less
> time to macro-expand — https://wingolog.org/archives/2020/06/03/a-baseline-compiler-for-guile

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de