From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: some rpm building questions Date: 04 Oct 2002 14:30:04 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87ofaatmib.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <1033682765.2197.59.camel@li.mine.nu> <1033698046.2059.140.camel@li.mine.nu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033734680 20877 127.0.0.1 (4 Oct 2002 12:31:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17xRbr-0005Pv-01 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 14:31:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17xRbl-0007pe-00; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:31:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17xRap-0007Rz-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17xRan-0007Rf-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:30:06 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip127.dokom.de ([195.138.42.127] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 17xRam-0007RS-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:30:04 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 17314 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Oct 2002 12:30:04 -0000 Original-To: Bo Forslund In-Reply-To: <1033698046.2059.140.camel@li.mine.nu> Original-Lines: 28 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1430 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1430 Bo Forslund writes: > The spec ended up packing like this. Is it OK? I think Rob can comment on this better than I can. > And how about ltdl? Can the old one be replaced? Can libtool use > this libltdl if the old one is replaced? We are going to release a Guile-1.6.1 soon (hopefully) that does not use a conflicting libltdl. You may want to wait for this. Alternatively, if the RPM format allows this, you can replace the old libltdl with the one from Guile. It is completely compatible and only fixes a few (significant) bugs. > guile > /usr/bin/guile > > libguile12 > /usr/bin/{guile-config, guile-snarf, guile-tools} > /usr/share/info/guile.info*, r5rs.info} These should probably go to libguile12-devel. You wont be able to install two versions of libguile when its package contains unversioned files, like guile-config. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel