From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Rottmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: What can I do to help? (conclusions) Date: 06 Oct 2002 19:34:26 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87ofa71nfh.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> References: <20021004132911.GD20754@www> <87k7ky5ggq.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> <20021006170804.GA7206@www> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033926046 2739 127.0.0.1 (6 Oct 2002 17:40:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 17:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Dale P. Smith" , guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17yFOW-0000i2-00 for ; Sun, 06 Oct 2002 19:40:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17yFNs-00064l-00; Sun, 06 Oct 2002 13:40:04 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17yFKW-0002Dy-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2002 13:36:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17yFJV-0001U3-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2002 13:35:34 -0400 Original-Received: from sproxy.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20] helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 17yFIT-0000Qa-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2002 13:34:30 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 5690 invoked by uid 0); 6 Oct 2002 17:34:27 -0000 Original-Received: from m185p005.adsl.highway.telekom.at (HELO alice.rhinosaur.lan) (62.47.191.5) by mail.gmx.net (mp001-rz3) with SMTP; 6 Oct 2002 17:34:27 -0000 Original-Received: from andy by alice.rhinosaur.lan with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 17yFIQ-0003Cd-00; Sun, 06 Oct 2002 19:34:26 +0200 Original-To: rm@fabula.de In-Reply-To: <20021006170804.GA7206@www> Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1466 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1466 rm@fabula.de writes: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:14:29PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > > Talking about C++, I suggest adding configure flag that causes the > > Guile interpreter to be linked by g++, so modules can be implemented > > in C++. (Python, on Debian, for example is linked this way). > > Hmmm, what are the consequences in terms of code emitted -- doesn't that > result in (horrible) stuff like symbol name mangling ? > No, you don't compile using C++, just use g++ for the linking stage. This way the executable will be linked against libstdc++, but there should be no other user-visible effects except that C++ modules will work. Andy -- Andreas Rottmann | Dru@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel