From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: socket.c Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 15:34:05 -0600 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87oesilc1e.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <5B00101A-54F4-11D8-969F-000A95C37894@lurchi.franken.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1075671335 13908 80.91.224.253 (1 Feb 2004 21:35:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 21:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 01 22:35:26 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AnPFV-0005Re-00 for ; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 22:35:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AnPFN-0000fJ-Fd for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 16:35:17 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AnPEm-0000eV-BC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 16:34:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AnPEG-0000U0-E1 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 16:34:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.93.216.237] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AnPEG-0000Tr-2x for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 16:34:08 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B35403D; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 15:34:06 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 100D61EF05E; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 15:34:06 -0600 (CST) Original-To: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: <5B00101A-54F4-11D8-969F-000A95C37894@lurchi.franken.de> (Michael Tuexen's message of "Sun, 1 Feb 2004 21:22:28 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3336 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3336 Michael Tuexen writes: > I would like to extend socket.c such that guile supports also SCTP. > If I submit patches against the 1.6.4 version is it possible that > the changes are included in the 1.6.5 release? Or should I submit > patches against the CVS version? Is it still possible to include the > changes into 1.6.5? It would depend on the nature of the changes. For example, I'm about to add srfi-31 to 1.6 and 1.7, but that will only involve the addition of a new file, a new test, and some documentation, and nothing should be affected unless you (use-modules (srfi srfi-31)). It would defintely be a judgement call. If the changes can be done in such a way that it's obvious that they won't break existing build or runtime behaviors, then that'd be fine, but it's worth mentioning that we're very likely to err on the side of being conservative with changes to 1.6. Hope this helps. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel