From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Text collation Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:47:42 +0200 Organization: LAAS-CNRS Message-ID: <87odrz31ld.fsf@laas.fr> References: <877j00cirs.fsf@laas.fr> <87hcz3mqhr.fsf@zip.com.au> <87r6x0qjyy.fsf@laas.fr> <877iyrbxj7.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> <87wt6rxy6z.fsf@laas.fr> <87ac3m2joj.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> <87slhclsj9.fsf@laas.fr> <87mz7kokad.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> <87ods0tf1m.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161852588 7476 80.91.229.2 (26 Oct 2006 08:49:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile-Devel , Rob Browning Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 26 10:49:46 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gd0vk-0003E2-AX for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:49:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gd0vj-0005E7-FY for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:49:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gd0vW-000560-C0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:49:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gd0vV-00054M-HA for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:49:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gd0vV-00053h-92 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:49:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.93.0.15] (helo=laas.laas.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Gd0vV-00055L-4j for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:49:25 -0400 Original-Received: by laas.laas.fr (8.13.7/8.13.4) with SMTP id k9Q8nFu6018069; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:49:17 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Neil Jerram X-URL: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 5 Brumaire an 215 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu Mail-Followup-To: Neil Jerram , Rob Browning , Guile-Devel In-Reply-To: <87ods0tf1m.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:40:21 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at CNRS-LAAS X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6188 Archived-At: Hi, Neil Jerram writes: > I agree with both separate module and separate library. If having a > separate library throws up problems, this can motivate us to address > them. In particular, if we keep it this way for `(ice-9 i18n)', do you think we should document both the existence of `libguile-i18n-vXX' and the C functions that are in this library? The patch I posted only documents the Scheme side, assuming that the C side is "not very useful" (which is debatable). Rob pointed out that since we do have those C functions anyway, then there's no compelling reason not to document them. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel