From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: SLIB Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:43:42 +1000 Message-ID: <87odh7gkwx.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <878x8icngm.fsf@chbouib.org> <66e540fe0708111000v22662b54sc62a9b297bf6308e@mail.gmail.com> <87fy2kxuu4.fsf@zip.com.au> <66e540fe0708160124p178d17fdqe2dce0c4648d5b60@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187304238 10436 80.91.229.12 (16 Aug 2007 22:43:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: mikael@djurfeldt.com Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 17 00:43:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ILo4G-0005KE-JT for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:43:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ILo4F-0007n2-So for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:43:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ILo4D-0007mN-Fo for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:43:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ILo4C-0007lv-4H for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:43:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ILo4B-0007ls-SV for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:43:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout1-1.pacific.net.au ([61.8.2.208] helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ILo4B-00045z-CP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:43:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.162]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2E2397F61; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:43:43 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2FC8.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.47.200]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA05B8C0A; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:43:42 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1ILo46-0000ww-7X; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:43:42 +1000 In-Reply-To: <66e540fe0708160124p178d17fdqe2dce0c4648d5b60@mail.gmail.com> (Mikael Djurfeldt's message of "Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:24:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6698 Archived-At: "Mikael Djurfeldt" writes: > > Yes, ideally, you should coordinate this with Aubrey. Why not explain > the situation for him? I think the simplest solution would be to use > the main idea of (ice-9 slib) explained above. Maybe Aubrey could > strip down guile.init a bit so that ice-9/slib.scm could load > guil.init and add the Guile module system specific things to make > loading into (ice-9 slib) and exporting from it work? Yep. Rob worked on that, or on slib.scm loading guile.init at least. He checked-in an slib.scm along those lines into the 1.6 branch, http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/guile/guile-core/ice-9/slib.scm?revision=1.32.2.10&root=guile&view=markup&pathrev=branch_release-1-6 I'm not certain if it covers every possibility, but it does mean current and future slib has a good chance of working. (I've only really nosed around this stuff lately to let my lint program work with it.) > Just loading guile.init in its current form simply does > not work together with the Guile module system. Unfortunately, it > doesn't become obvious until one has used it enough. That might be what I meant. Slib seems well setup to turn the top level of any scheme into a more or less uniform slib environment, it's not clear it tries to know much about modules (in guile or any other scheme). _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel