From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: More explicit support for Unicode title case Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:28:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87oclipwbu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2bc5f8210912210602l5caba56ahb50381f666a59737@mail.gmail.com> <87d428cca7.fsf@gnu.org> <2bc5f8210912212137m132f0d2ag44d39b827a146050@mail.gmail.com> <366328.13621.qm@web37904.mail.mud.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262039346 22909 80.91.229.12 (28 Dec 2009 22:29:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Mike Gran Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 28 23:28:58 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NPO5B-0008RK-Vk for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:28:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41338 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPO5B-0004MS-8y for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:28:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPO50-0004LV-TB for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:28:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPO4w-0004Jh-7K for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:28:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34867 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPO4w-0004Jc-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:28:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:9007) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPO4v-0002OM-CY for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:28:41 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,464,1257116400"; d="scan'208";a="39442639" Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr (HELO nixey) ([80.67.176.83]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 28 Dec 2009 23:28:39 +0100 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 8 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Niv=F4se?= an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <366328.13621.qm@web37904.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Mike Gran's message of "Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:16:22 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9803 Archived-At: Hello, Mike Gran writes: >> >> +SCM_API scm_t_wchar scm_c_titlecase (scm_t_wchar c); > >> > >> > I think it should be documented in the manual. >>=20 >> Actually, I'm going to hold off on this, since documenting this would >> require at least some explanation of scm_t_wchar, which seems to me to >> be outside the scope of this patch. I'm happy to add documentation >> for this (as well as the other wchar functions), although some context >> from the originator of that typedef (`git blame' says it was Mike >> Gran) would be useful. > > I wonder if these should be API. It is probably too late to change them,= =20 > since they've existed as API since the late 1990s, but, as far as I can > tell, no one has ever used them (I checked codesearch.google.com=20 > and koders.com). They've also never been documented. > > But, a patch for documenting these is attached. I think it=E2=80=99s worth it, please push! Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.