From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: a few proposed patches Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 09:54:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87obpgy7kq.fsf@pobox.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337673274 15718 80.91.229.3 (22 May 2012 07:54:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 07:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 22 09:54:31 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SWjvK-0005zO-UJ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 May 2012 09:54:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45206 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWjvK-0006QL-FF for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 May 2012 03:54:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56163) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWjvC-0006PE-NO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2012 03:54:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWjvA-0007MN-Oh for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2012 03:54:22 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:34270 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWjvA-0007Lt-G9 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2012 03:54:20 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45C5847D; Tue, 22 May 2012 03:54:17 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=TyVNKgPtosCbA+ECLwwBUbMaBps=; b=JTSV3z af40mHoIk8SKrbL5caL4xEemDto9IRBTz8+hwgFqwzQ588X1nOwdFXnKEOkLaCks vOF9OOdYo8NjCeFBtvmcoKfNAjpDL0cO2qh1DsTeMXTPkPi/peEqfoUhzPXiiFZ6 BfPVoFjeS7BCHZw+ek27nUwJkn98ZtITGVeRw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=p95IHgzbt9pW3x3aKoOY/aIqSmtFBsKx 7QFFeIWot5Q5KfpmGDwjaPa96xcTVVOW5hHbH4LJk29B/uum9XycOMWj8mC/om0v cuNhNEAKxHsUEgI+EejMNMfiS248aUbhCB39UHYFK9khVvODyZXrPS4VoKq7zzLQ jNXP6ItunEA= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE81F847C; Tue, 22 May 2012 03:54:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E37F847A; Tue, 22 May 2012 03:54:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Ken Raeburn's message of "Mon, 21 May 2012 01:45:50 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 543CFDAC-A3E3-11E1-A18A-E981AF15ED39-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14497 Archived-At: On Mon 21 May 2012 07:45, Ken Raeburn writes: > I've also checked in on master a couple pretty straightforward-looking > fixes. I don't know if either would be applicable to the current > release. Thank you very much for these, especially the locking one! How did you catch the locking bug, just by code inspection? It could be at the root of a tricky bug that has been following me around since that code was introduced... Thankfully those bugs do not apply to the stable branch. Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/