From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christopher Allan Webber Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: What is needed in guildhall to include it in Guile? Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:17:02 -0800 Message-ID: <87oab88va9.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <87k2lw1yvd.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456165052 11338 80.91.229.3 (22 Feb 2016 18:17:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Arne Babenhauserheide Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 22 19:17:30 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aXv34-0003oi-0H for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:17:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51069 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXv33-00022f-Gn for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:17:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56609) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXv2w-00022I-I3 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:17:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXv2t-0007hf-TI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:17:22 -0500 Original-Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:50294) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXv2t-0007hU-Oo for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:17:19 -0500 Original-Received: from oolong (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 167622661D; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:17:03 -0500 (EST) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 24.5.1 In-reply-to: <87k2lw1yvd.fsf@web.de> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 50.116.34.160 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18187 Archived-At: Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > Hi, > > In january there was a thread here about Guildhall with the notion > >> I encourage you to hack on Guildhall to make it more usable for your >> needs. > > I finished my PhD last month, so I have some freed-up time =E2=80=94 an= d I would > like to use some of it to hack on Guildhall and make it ready for > inclusion in Guile. > > However there=E2=80=99s one stumbling block: I don=E2=80=99t see what=E2= =80=99s actually missing > from it. So I want to be bold and request something: > > > Please tell me what=E2=80=99s missing in Guildhall, so I can implement = it. > > > Best wishes, > Arne > > [1]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2016-01/msg00010.ht= ml > > PS: I write now, because I just stumbled over a situation again, where > I=E2=80=99d have loved to just have guildhall at hand by default. I= wanted > to test uptop.scm which needs guile-ssh, so I just wanted to quickl= y > get guile-ssh and run the script. Yes, guix can do that. But the > guix daemons weren=E2=80=99t running. I've never run it so it's hard for me to know. The "obvious" idea might be to get a Guix package of Guildhall so more of us might play with it? ;= )