From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Christopher Allan Webber Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Weak tables harmful to GC? Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:50:01 -0500 Message-ID: <87o9ow830m.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <87wp9gwz8m.fsf@gnu.org> <87fug4o8z2.fsf@pobox.com> <87wp54z3p5.fsf@gnu.org> <87zi9th1i6.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87y3o454pr.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2tvncs5.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87wp3mwwef.fsf@gnu.org> <87po9c88rx.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87o9owm9v1.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1508892616 22992 195.159.176.226 (25 Oct 2017 00:50:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:50:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.3.1 Cc: Andy Wingo , 19180@debbugs.gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 25 02:50:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e79tU-0004J6-QF for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 02:50:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46065 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e79tc-0000Vw-43 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:50:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e79tU-0000Uc-HO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:50:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e79tT-0005RD-Ns for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: from dustycloud.org ([2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:feae:cb51]:45786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e79tT-0005QM-K8; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from oolong (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D922266FE; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:50:02 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <87o9owm9v1.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:feae:cb51 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:19348 Archived-At: Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Christopher Allan Webber skribis: > >> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> >>> Also, it no longer displays the pathological behavior shown in >>> . >>> >>> Of course, even better if people could test the two patches and confi= rm >>> that it works for them. >>> >>> Then if there are no objections I=E2=80=99d like to merge them in =E2= =80=98stable-2.2=E2=80=99. >> >> Sounds great indeed, but it didn't apply to master or stable-2.2 for m= e? > > Really? The two patches should apply to stable-2.2, though you need to > apply them in the right order (I have it applied over > 80696023620eae12f9b2f167aee834f632a32739.) > > Ludo=E2=80=99. Huh? What object is this? I don't see it in my git repo. This is the latest commit I see to stable-2.2, which is also what Savannah sees: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?h=3Dstable-2.2&id=3D= a74d4ee4f6e062ff640f2532c9cfc9977bb68a49