From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: snarfer guard macro name decision: SCM_MAGIC_SNARFER Date: 15 Mar 2002 00:40:49 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87n0xawwe6.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <877kognusb.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87henkgmbi.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016149159 27620 127.0.0.1 (14 Mar 2002 23:39:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 23:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16leoZ-0007BO-00 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 00:39:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16leoP-0000yJ-00; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:39:09 -0500 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip228.dokom.de ([195.138.42.228] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16leo2-0000xN-00 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:38:46 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 23346 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Mar 2002 23:40:49 -0000 Original-To: ttn@glug.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:52 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:52 Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > everything is checked in now. please feel free to read the new docs, > try the new guile-snarf, and complain loudly so weirdnesses can be fixed > (when the going gets weird, the weird turn pro)... Please read the "Stable branch will freeze" article in guile-devel. Here is the relevant excerpt: The guile-snarf changes need to be brought back to a state where guile-snarf is completely compatible with the last guile-snarf that has been installed. It can add features, but must not remove any. Also it should define SCM_MAGIC_SNARFER in addition to SCM_MAGIC_SNARF_INIT when pre-processing the C file. The fact that SCM_MAGIC_SNARFER is defined should be documented, while SCM_MAGIC_SNARF_INIT should not be documented. Thien-Thi, I can make these changes if you want me to. Please feel free to hack on guile-snarf in the HEAD branch. I really think your work on the snarfer is important, please don't get me wrong. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel