From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Handling BUGS. Date: 24 Mar 2002 21:40:38 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87n0wxzol5.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <87g02t4zgn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87lmcko60l.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87elic8k8e.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87r8mcgx4m.fsf@gaff.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87n0x01bci.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87u1r77a7c.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87wuw2gk81.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017002371 7380 127.0.0.1 (24 Mar 2002 20:39:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 20:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rlb@defaultvalue.org, evan@glug.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16pEm2-0001uu-00 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 21:39:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pElk-0007Ef-00; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 15:39:12 -0500 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip34.dokom.de ([195.138.42.34] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pEkn-0007Ck-00 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 15:38:14 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 982 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Mar 2002 20:40:38 -0000 Original-To: ttn@glug.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 29 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:182 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:182 Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > I see that we already have a workbook/bugs directory (thanks!). What > about putting the following README into it, as a start: > > [field deinition / documentation] > > cool. Ok, I will 'implement' this then and move the current BUGS files into the database. > The names of the bug files can be chosen arbitrarily, but must > start with a lower case letter. If you don't want to use a > symbolic name, use a name of the form "bug-" where is the > next unused number. these names are used to refer to bugs from > within the description of other bugs, and in discussions, so it > helps to use mildly descriptive names. > > maybe something like bug-000.no-bugs-database ? I don't think bugs need numbers, just no-bugs-database should be enough. > we also need to ask if/how a bug-000.scm (that would exercise the > bug) are to be referenced and/or included in the database. Yes, good point. What about simply saying that the bug file itself has no "." in its name, and related files like test scripts do? _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel