From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Items blocking release 1.6.1 (2002-04-21) Date: 22 Apr 2002 20:04:02 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87n0vvzk31.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <87d6wtqawx.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019498610 25959 127.0.0.1 (22 Apr 2002 18:03:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16zi9y-0006ka-00 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:03:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zi9d-00010d-00; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:03:09 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip169.dokom.de ([195.138.42.169] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zi78-0000oL-00 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:00:34 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 1193 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Apr 2002 18:04:02 -0000 Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <87d6wtqawx.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Original-Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:446 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:446 Rob Browning writes: > (1) bugs/optargs-bound-gone [mvo?] Yes, it's [mvo]. > Marius: you discussed a fix for this in email, but also mention that > it's functionality is fairly easily worked around via default value > -- so are we fixing it for 1.6, or are we adding a NEWS entry > recommending the alternative approach? If we are fixing it, and if > you can describe the fix, I can do the work. I'll fix this this evening. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel