From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: 1.6.0: major soname version decremented? Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:25:30 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87n0q8iv85.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87k7lg3mw2.fsf@peder.flower> <87elbo743o.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <8765wxdjr8.fsf@peder.flower> <873cs0kdfu.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87adm8dc76.fsf@peder.flower> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032794769 9747 127.0.0.1 (23 Sep 2002 15:26:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 15:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17tV67-0002X3-00 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:26:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17tV69-00010g-00; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17tV5a-0000ZL-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:25:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17tV5Y-0000YZ-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:25:33 -0400 Original-Received: from n66644228.ipcdsl.net ([66.64.4.228] helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17tV5Y-0000XK-00; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:25:32 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56F5C7C; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:25:30 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8A7222BC3; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:25:30 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen In-Reply-To: <87adm8dc76.fsf@peder.flower> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2002 16:15:25 +0200") Original-Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1367 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1367 Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > Yes, I did for Cygwin. I expect no big problems, though. Naughty, naughty. (No wonder we were hearing complaints about guile being too unstable for LilyPond.) :> >> Nope. I knew it would decrease the major number, I just didn't think >> it would matter. If this *is* in fact a big problem, please explain, >> and we'll figure out what should be done about it. > > No, I think we'll be fine. Cygwin now has an old libguile14, and a > newer libguile12 package. By the time that we'll see a new libguile14 > package it will get a higher version number than the old one, and the > old one will be replaced automatically. OK, good. Feel free to raise the issue again if this turns out to be more serious. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel