From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: file-exists? confused Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:45:10 +1100 Message-ID: <87mzfayt7t.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <20060313165454.M814@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> <877j6y6o3d.fsf@zip.com.au> <87acbsslke.fsf@zip.com.au> <87slp6qgyn.fsf@minimini.mvo.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143593126 1892 80.91.229.2 (29 Mar 2006 00:45:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bill Schottstaedt , guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 29 02:45:24 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOOoK-00010l-Lu for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 02:45:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOOoK-00083X-7k for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:45:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FOOoH-000802-E6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:45:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FOOoG-0007z1-UM for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:45:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOOoG-0007yq-SA for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:45:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.84] (helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FOOq6-0003nL-IN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:47:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.87]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439BF3282C6; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:45:15 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp22DF.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.34.223]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k2T0jD0D021814; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:45:14 +1100 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FOOoB-0002Rf-00; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:45:11 +1100 Original-To: Marius Vollmer Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87slp6qgyn.fsf@minimini.mvo.home> (Marius Vollmer's message of "26 Mar 2006 00:48:00 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5822 Archived-At: Marius Vollmer writes: > >> There doesn't seem to be any room in that struct, but if it's always >> created by scm_make_port_type then perhaps adding new fields to the >> end would keep compatibility. > > Yes, that is good enough. I might do something for stat and readdir first, then that struct. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel