From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Stack calibration Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:19:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87myh7iqxu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <47B2A8DF.9070004@tammer.net> <87hc8lw0q2.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <49dd78620809271120j17097ffq4da8f2b8dffd4efd@mail.gmail.com> <87abdsf337.fsf@gnu.org> <49dd78620809301510q173d1777rd26240ce40f204f0@mail.gmail.com> <49dd78620810021530u8f29699x88fa8c0241105a07@mail.gmail.com> <87d4ide4md.fsf@gnu.org> <49dd78620810061611v2e67d646v29b479ca1fb23274@mail.gmail.com> <49dd78620810091553gbb10a0aod55076f5eb93b28b@mail.gmail.com> <87k5cfujwl.fsf@gnu.org> <49dd78620810120859t44cb78f3q46a19f472db2ec45@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1223968855 22638 80.91.229.12 (14 Oct 2008 07:20:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:20:55 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 14 09:21:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KpeDu-0001bQ-6i for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:21:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50145 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KpeCn-0005tU-DE for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:20:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KpeCg-0005tE-Pm for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:20:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KpeCc-0005sm-B7 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:20:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43386 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KpeCc-0005sj-3Y for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:20:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:43372) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KpeCb-0006dU-Ic for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:20:21 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KpeCY-0003aM-Th for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:20:19 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KpeCO-0004aO-Hx for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:20:08 +0000 Original-Received: from 193.50.110.60 ([193.50.110.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:20:08 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by 193.50.110.60 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:20:08 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.50.110.60 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 23 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vend=E9miaire?= an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:N+uVGGICNZVqvdQ1inSFV+Tijzc= X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7775 Archived-At: Hi Neil, "Neil Jerram" writes: > > Goodness, that Ludovic, can't he ever just be happy with what I've proposed... Eh eh, I'm starting to have a reputation! ;-) I did think you may be annoyed by that review after all the work you had put it, but well. :-) > ...oh but hang on, we already have arbitrary callouts to Scheme: the > evaluator traps! > > > So yes, I think we can actually do this without any change to the C > code except adding %get-stack-depth, by using an evaluator trap. Great! > Evaluator traps, on the other hand, will catch everything. (At the > cost of running very slowly, but I think that's OK for just this one > calibration step.) Yep, sounds like a good idea. Thanks! Ludo' the nitpicker. ;-)