From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: request review: branch "wingo" Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:00:15 +0100 Message-ID: <87myamqb6o.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> References: <874oxapu6c.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <87fxgtnulh.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1239541262 17590 80.91.229.12 (12 Apr 2009 13:01:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 12 15:02:20 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LszJr-0005YM-Ff for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:01:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34887 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LszIT-0002hO-0w for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:00:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LszIO-0002gr-J5 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:00:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LszIJ-0002fA-CJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:00:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58494 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LszIJ-0002f3-6z for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:00:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:47808) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LszII-0002V9-LG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:00:18 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-145-49-20.range86-145.btcentralplus.com [86.145.49.20]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C891F6732; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:00:16 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from arudy.ossau.uklinux.net (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86AB38013; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:00:15 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Fri\, 03 Apr 2009 10\:51\:35 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8407 Archived-At: Andy Wingo writes: > I went ahead and pushed an 80%-only patch, as you suggest. > > All UNIX systems that I know of have getrlimit. Windows does not of > course, but it seems that their stack limit is hard-coded: > > http://www.mapleprimes.com/forum/stack_limit > > In any case, it seems that when Windows people bump up against this > limit they'll let us know and we can send them looking for the right > #define. OK, that sounds like a reasonable position. Thanks, Neil