From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: MinGW build fixes Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:03:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87my7uh7b7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87my7uk1kc.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1246061023 31365 80.91.229.12 (27 Jun 2009 00:03:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:03:43 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 27 02:03:37 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MKLOK-0003pH-JL for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:03:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34950 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MKLOJ-0002v6-TF for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:03:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MKLOD-0002um-Ed for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:03:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MKLO8-0002tK-Hg for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:03:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48581 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MKLO8-0002tH-C6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:03:24 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:36115 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MKLO7-00039M-QC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:03:24 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MKLO5-0005Ux-CM for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:03:21 +0000 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:03:21 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:03:21 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 39 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 9 Messidor an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:xmc95fdE+5i2zuO+W/lJRNJ729E= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8780 Archived-At: Hello! Neil Jerram writes: > - MinGW can't export/import struct variables from/to a DLL, so wrap > the ones needed by inline.h in exported/imported pointer variables. [...] > * libguile/gc.h (scm_i_freelist_ptr, scm_i_freelist2_ptr, > scm_i_master_freelist_ptr, scm_i_master_freelist2_ptr): New global > variable declarations. > > * libguile/inline.h (scm_cell): Use scm_i_freelist_ptr and > scm_i_master_freelist_ptr instead of scm_i_freelist and > scm_i_master_freelist. > (scm_double_cell): Use scm_i_freelist2_ptr and > scm_i_master_freelist2_ptr instead of scm_i_freelist2 and > scm_i_master_freelist2. > > * libguile/threads.c (scm_i_freelist_ptr, scm_i_freelist2_ptr): New > global variables. [...] > SCM_API struct scm_t_cell_type_statistics scm_i_master_freelist; > +SCM_API struct scm_t_cell_type_statistics *scm_i_master_freelist_ptr; > SCM_API struct scm_t_cell_type_statistics scm_i_master_freelist2; > +SCM_API struct scm_t_cell_type_statistics *scm_i_master_freelist2_ptr; I don't understand why this fixes anything, since the `_ptr' variables are declared as `SCM_API' just like the non-`_ptr' variables. Also, it adds an indirection, which may impact performance. Other than that, I think this is good news! Thanks, Ludo'.