From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:01:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87my66uvwu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8763cuwdkl.fsf@gnu.org> <1250007202.30365.85.camel@localhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250010592 998 80.91.229.12 (11 Aug 2009 17:09:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:09:52 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 11 19:09:46 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Maur3-0003ck-FD for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:09:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42628 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Maur1-0004hI-Qn for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:09:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Maujb-0000zS-Cf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaujW-0000vJ-NO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36953 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaujW-0000uv-H6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:01:58 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:41262 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MaujV-0002dO-Iy for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:01:58 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MaujS-0000Ng-Mt for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:01:55 +0000 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:01:54 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:01:54 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 90 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 24 Thermidor an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volutio?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?n?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:zp1H2LcxBxi3um17GGSpRDmiGNw= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9067 Archived-At: Mike Gran writes: > All of srfi-13.c isn't ready to operate on non-8-bit strings. string=? > calls MY_VALIDATE_SUBSTRING_SPEC_COPY, which calls scm_i_string_chars. > scm_i_string_chars either returns a pointer to the Latin-1 strings or > errors with the error you saw. OK, thanks for the explanation. Apparently the disassembler needs to be taught Unicode: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- scheme@(guile-user)> ,c x Disassembly of #: 0 (load-symbol "\x01") ;; . 6 (add) 7 (link-now) 8 (variable-ref) 9 (return) scheme@(guile-user)> ,c y Disassembly of #: 0 (load-symbol "\x01") ;; . 6 (sub) 7 (link-now) 8 (variable-ref) 9 (return) scheme@(guile-user)> ,c a Disassembly of #: Backtrace: In system/base/compile.scm: 244: 0 [decompile-fold # # #f ...] In language/assembly/decompile-bytecode.scm: 37: 1 [decompile-bytecode # #f ()] In language/assembly/decompile-bytecode.scm: 88: 2 [lp ((load-symbol "\x01"))] In language/assembly/decompile-bytecode.scm: 100: 3 [# {97}] In unknown file: ?: 4* [opcode->instruction {97}] ERROR: In procedure opcode->instruction: ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting INSTRUCTION_P): 97 scheme@(guile-user)> ,c d Disassembly of #: 0 (load-symbol "\x01") ;; . 6 (not) 7 (link-now) 8 (variable-ref) 9 (return) scheme@(guile-user)> ,c c Disassembly of #: Backtrace: In system/base/compile.scm: 244: 0 [decompile-fold # # #f ...] In language/assembly/decompile-bytecode.scm: 37: 1 [decompile-bytecode # #f ()] In language/assembly/decompile-bytecode.scm: 88: 2 [lp ((load-symbol "\x01"))] In language/assembly/decompile-bytecode.scm: 100: 3 [# {99}] In unknown file: ?: 4* [opcode->instruction {99}] ERROR: In procedure opcode->instruction: ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting INSTRUCTION_P): 99 scheme@(guile-user)> ,c abcd Disassembly of #: 0 (load-symbol "\x01abc") ;; .abc 9 (not) 10 (link-now) 11 (variable-ref) 12 (return) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Ideas on how to fix this? Thanks, Ludo'.