From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Do you recognize these modules? Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 22:14:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87mx59kxqw.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87zk9r8p1s.fsf@gnuvola.org> <8762bz89zg.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87r4unszj2.fsf@gnu.org> <87k40eg0k1.fsf@gnuvola.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337112889 19609 80.91.229.3 (15 May 2012 20:14:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 15 22:14:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SUO8r-00033m-D6 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 22:14:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41082 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUO8q-0004xk-P8 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:14:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45056) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUO8n-0004wN-I9 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:14:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUO8l-0007B3-LR for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:14:41 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:60583 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUO8l-00076R-Cr; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:14:39 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C8DA5DB; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:14:34 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=qDXkpW4e6tOEjTX1NHaxymdwYNk=; b=v6zYkG f9qSiD3UykAUJ2WGO+kUo9bwJDLcJ58tuCoyPlj/lx2Drfh+gHgo8uBWtSzTTtFR bCsUZvhX43R6dE1dEOkJfAmu0Rg6MHbJ/vFbzNlAKK2OKmNRuqIDQHz57FW1LQPI yXMHByYQBv3JRPzFDEpF8vYGp9b2m7lAKpr04= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=C00XviS5Us4Hw47k/7lXDAJ+qpsGIlon 92nihJnV5dgyXZOeAQGsV2ma0rAdpIyvMEyoOmvWf2mt/mjMASl6En/LnqQ7LzOO 5hE8HN8XwQ2YRqo+Zr3na8TEr6OBlT7n5q1C9swa25ta1Ol2KKy/qVQ/umaHoTsH yvWjqvS/LTk= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC685A5DA; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:14:34 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 506DEA5D9; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:14:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87k40eg0k1.fsf@gnuvola.org> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Mon, 14 May 2012 19:00:30 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 96969D16-9ECA-11E1-9CB0-E981AF15ED39-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14446 Archived-At: Heya TTN, Great to have your hack-power here. On Mon 14 May 2012 19:00, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > Also, i can either add a file to branch_release-1-8 (exercising > my regained write privs :-D), or post it. What's best? 2.0 is the current stable branch, so any changes should go there first. If it's a build fix or some other fix related to forward-compatibility with 2.0, it can go on 1.8 as well. We should avoid adding interfaces to 1.8, though. When in doubt, it's best (and much appreciated) to mail the list. If no one responds in a few days, go ahead and push it of course. Does that sound sensible to you? Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/