From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Request for feedback on SRFI-126 Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:33:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87mvw3xctt.fsf@T420.taylan> References: <87zj08t5w1.fsf@T420.taylan> <1555352.V50ucWGNsT@fluss> <87si5wz6c7.fsf@T420.taylan> <1934729.vNcQvOluRK@fluss> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443708644 22530 80.91.229.3 (1 Oct 2015 14:10:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, guile-devel To: Arne Babenhauserheide Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 01 16:10:34 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZheYx-0002Ar-NZ for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 16:10:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50612 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZheYx-00030w-5h for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:10:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhYN2-0002UJ-57 for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:33:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhYN1-0007ze-2i for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:33:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]:34024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhYMz-0007zL-An; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:33:37 -0400 Original-Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so19285736wic.1; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:33:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZmSuBR7lvwF7dy29z/jgOQC3+qqsqeBqacLHjXJFYVo=; b=CY2OIgABM26S+HK/ME3VZhuII4rxeG03esTxwjpREW/W/byeiET6ORtprAkrNcKbUd rPH+o3Kcw9039spPPPqffYns2bKHW9tUlT9fmRxBjuh//v6uhc7MatneULmEb8maOevz tGo2LOY1ig1AZixXXfmqc5VuglAlXXeEBkm7/+PgbxMRIof93UtIeYxDmnE8eHu2V1m2 mw3uUFh1wqLIJyZMxDsFpUQyjmtThE+8GjdTcCNRdqta1DZmFxEuxmiN0pRAc0GW+brB LaQehVf2AgSdzI5lOoED4vXmyn0eLrLgd6+OE45Kx5hyBHPUew/eA7Y0DHs92QwSvbVk 9OEQ== X-Received: by 10.194.178.196 with SMTP id da4mr10342703wjc.41.1443684816722; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:33:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from T420.taylan ([2a02:908:c32:4740:221:ccff:fe66:68f0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gt4sm1662542wib.21.2015.10.01.00.33.35 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:33:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1934729.vNcQvOluRK@fluss> (Arne Babenhauserheide's message of "Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:20:23 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::230 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:12068 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:17885 Archived-At: Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 09:58:32 schrieb Taylan Ulrich Bay=C4=B1= rl=C4=B1 /Kammer: >> Exactly, I agree. It should be noted though that some things can be >> implemented purely as portable libraries, so there needn't be a Request >> For Implementations to do it, whereas some other things, which I call >> "fundamental" features, need to be supported by implementations, so they >> need to be in the language specification or an authoritative SRFI. > > What is an authoritative SRFI? One which is available in most > implementations? Yeah, broadly speaking an SRFI that has wide acceptance, or is set out to gain wide acceptance by means of being as uncontroversial as possible and such. > Best wishes, > Arne Taylan