From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: compiler messages Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:58:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87mvln2vh5.fsf@pobox.com> References: <20160630105700.GB10380@eros.local> <87h9c168zk.fsf@pobox.com> <20160707125214.GA29385@eros.local> <878tx83zpk.fsf@pobox.com> <20160712000821.GA26872@eros.local> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1468306766 21597 80.91.229.3 (12 Jul 2016 06:59:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 06:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Tobin Harding Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 12 08:59:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bMrf3-0008LS-F4 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:59:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37927 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMrf2-0003QD-LR for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 02:59:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50863) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMreo-0003PT-Ct for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 02:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMrej-0005l0-EZ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 02:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.67]:63702 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMrej-0005jC-8G for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 02:58:57 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55FF23C2F; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 02:58:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=qjLPQ0uFW6xv0Tj/ry6izmUHvEc=; b=gbqTl7 p1JmIgduW0DDCUH1IsBgtKZiCnc2KuEt0OtRfT6yH1+T42mjg/lrKl+H4tZKDWqz z7pbm36rLGYW/cJ+OULtMJ1/p+EJpWDYHMi167a7HaiNY+g/XFbgemOrLihLPigD 8EX5t8n3kgW2nfLhsdKVCgf0s5/AzTcjYUjFU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=XKn6PAQ0P2UTjTUtZSdtpEX6ZpjLp71j hZnARGIcJF/ZTKr/Z/ESVVgSxsiSABaJpTO69cx2zW/p0217nD067jiyuS8XE/U6 ChKH76Jwmeh86BQkAuy/l21gI1GFNC3lmUi6djqgvvqV1KigHpiyBfiC4gjCMFOS FKWr1fSh4eo= Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9F323C2E; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 02:58:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC81B23C2D; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 02:58:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20160712000821.GA26872@eros.local> (Tobin Harding's message of "Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:08:21 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 18A17872-47FE-11E6-8E38-28A6F1301B6D-02397024!pb-sasl2.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.147.108.67 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18482 Archived-At: On Tue 12 Jul 2016 02:08, Tobin Harding writes: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 06:29:43PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote: >> On Thu 07 Jul 2016 14:52, Tobin Harding writes: >> >> > I have two issues with this patch after developing with a patched Guile for a >> > week or so. First is that I have not been able to pass command line options to >> > Guile while using Geiser, my workaround has been setting the variable >> > %quiet-compiler directly with (set! %quiet-compiler #t) from within ~/.guile. >> >> I think you can do this. Customize geiser-guile-binary to be a "guile >> --quiet" or whatever. > > I tried that already to no avail, thanks for the idea though. Did you try making it a list? Sorry, that's what I meant to type. '("guile" "--foo"). Andy