From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vijay Marupudi Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added srfi-214: flexvectors Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:38:43 -0500 Message-ID: <87mtjqxhv0.fsf@vijaymarupudi.com> References: <87fspjzq67.fsf@vijaymarupudi.com> <8b6bb918e76adc83c5785f6e544c5169bba8f25d.camel@telenet.be> <87y23axvxu.fsf@vijaymarupudi.com> <5553e04cc9f3b7d4c421829c18b1188a867707ad.camel@telenet.be> <87pmomxpbh.fsf@vijaymarupudi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9708"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Maxime Devos , guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 21 00:21:59 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nAgkg-0002HV-HZ for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 00:21:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46160 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAgkf-0006FF-LP for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 18:21:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAeDl-0003HQ-MA for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:39:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a0c:5a00:149::25] (port=54326 helo=mailtransmit04.runbox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAeDf-0001uS-LB for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:39:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailtransmit03.runbox ([10.9.9.163] helo=aibo.runbox.com) by mailtransmit04.runbox.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1nAeCv-00Eb81-Kj; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 21:38:57 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vijaymarupudi.com; s=selector1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From; bh=+QJI2zxdZEx7AjFfWi5y325w83Q8q3qQwCqL7ZuEzJE=; b=0hBcXtDO7i70kSVzJTawga9sRj ccRelqNEhs8JQLe4AJ02gdEU3Sl1BZV4wn1DnSSPKxGnzv5IFAIUvxvKyJNU3IaZ36PgCxuDrJCIf NlHyXA1eJ9NSAgfqP6kFGPD8gTv8GDCm6TLh32hi3DbM8kFwqh4WcAEJzcK2B7FCVUPEEPHoemWWn KwSqZPg0XQZ1GWvtXtY2ktFp10iaB2inHP6Co0nRqkltJB2WIhF5dX1J7BbJXwHdYjTKGnCOZ0Dzz SRTVk//KgYEkAxa2Hh6xmfeYL9jBvVD3xcwfWejOdv9sKe6GRm4BGa9RBV4HPyENbTiKWz35XbHHk uFr6y8Zg==; Original-Received: from [10.9.9.73] (helo=submission02.runbox) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nAeCv-00017Z-4g; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 21:38:57 +0100 Original-Received: by submission02.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated ID (1028486)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1nAeCm-0007BL-OB; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 21:38:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a0c:5a00:149::25 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a0c:5a00:149::25; envelope-from=vijay@vijaymarupudi.com; helo=mailtransmit04.runbox.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.devel:21050 Archived-At: > I haven't really looked closely at the documentation or code, > but the structure of the patch seems fine now That's good to hear, awaiting code review then! > , except perhaps: > >> "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including > > Unicode has been a thing now since quite a while, so writing =E2=80=9CSof= tware=E2=80=9D > with curly quotes instead of "straight quotes" is possible now. Or > perhaps Texinfo takes care of that by itself. I copied the original text of the license in the srfi, I don't want to modify it just for typographical reasons, but the maintainers are welcome to do that if they wish! ~ Vijay