From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Handling BUGS. Date: 25 Mar 2002 22:05:36 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87lmcgz7bz.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <87g02t4zgn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87lmcko60l.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87elic8k8e.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87r8mcgx4m.fsf@gaff.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87n0x01bci.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87u1r77a7c.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87wuw2gk81.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87n0wxzol5.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017090379 13828 127.0.0.1 (25 Mar 2002 21:06:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 21:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rlb@defaultvalue.org, evan@glug.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16pbfX-0003au-00 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 22:06:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pbfM-0008B4-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:06:08 -0500 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip40.dokom.de ([195.138.42.40] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pbcU-00080Q-00 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:03:10 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 2589 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Mar 2002 21:05:36 -0000 Original-To: ttn@glug.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 27 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:194 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:194 Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > From: Marius Vollmer > Date: 24 Mar 2002 21:40:38 +0100 > > I don't think bugs need numbers, just no-bugs-database should be > enough. > > numbers are symbolic (see comp.lang.lisp thread on packaging). they > have extra properties that are useful for ordering and concise to > reference. Whatever. Let's not unproductively quibble over this. Let's just say that numbers are OK, too. > Yes, good point. What about simply saying that the bug file itself > has no "." in its name, and related files like test scripts do? > > i suggest dot dirs in my other mail (using numbers, but i fancy > N.SHORT-DESC would be the righteous hybrid solution). A directory can be seen as a related file, as well, I'd say: bug-12.stuff/ I'll mention this as well. I will just trot along in workbook/bugs even if we don't have complete consensus yet. I want to use the new mechanism already for better managing the 1.6 release. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel