From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16) Date: 28 May 2002 19:45:33 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87lma4upxe.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <878z6jn0uw.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87r8k41h0j.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87r8k41ctd.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <20020526165939.GA27611@www> <87ptzhuxqz.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <20020527213832.GC28747@www> <873cwczy6g.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <20020528102222.GB29680@www> <87r8jwmeyh.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022608061 3470 127.0.0.1 (28 May 2002 17:47:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 17:47:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rm@fabula.de, Neil Jerram , guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Cl4O-0000tr-00 for ; Tue, 28 May 2002 19:47:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Cl4n-0002wi-00; Tue, 28 May 2002 13:48:05 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip1.dokom.de ([195.138.42.1] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Cl2N-0002pn-00 for ; Tue, 28 May 2002 13:45:36 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 935 invoked by uid 1000); 28 May 2002 17:45:34 -0000 Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <87r8jwmeyh.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Original-Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:660 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:660 Rob Browning writes: > Given this approach, we'd still have COPYING as is, but we'd also have > LICENSE which I presume would contain something like this: > > Unless otherwise noted, all files in Guile are covered under the > terms of the GPL as described in COPYING, but with the following > additional exception: ... > > Files in Guile covered by other licenses: > > ./guile-readline/* -- covered under the GPL, see COPYING. > > etc. Yes, that's how I interpret this as well. > This approach seems OK to me. How does everyone else feel about it? It is basically what Neil proposed, only with LICENSE instead of COPYING-GUILE. Since "LICENSE" could be a standard file in the future, present in many packages, while COPYING-GUILE can not (because of the -GUILE suffix which is package specific), I'd say let's go with LICENSE. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel