From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Cc: owinebar@free-expression.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Threads and asyncs
Date: 04 Sep 2002 19:40:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lm6hjh0t.fsf@becket.becket.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200209050243.TAA19428@morrowfield.regexps.com>
Tom Lord <lord@regexps.com> writes:
> Thank you.
Aw, shucks. You have an amazing knack to turn any discussion into a
pissing contest. Ok, you win! You are better than anyone else at
spraying urine around.
Now, back to the point:
Why do we have to change at all? You seem to offer continual pressure
and impetus for the notion that guile is *deeply* wrong in its current
trajectory, but you don't seem to be either cooperating in development
or doing more than just arguing for the sake of arguing.
You want guile to be inconsistent with nearly every other Scheme
system out there (even MIT scheme now has #f != ()) for what? So that
it will be compatible with systas?
Is this whole stupid on-going flame fest of yours merely about some
desire to have the world adopt your favorite system instead of the one
they are already using? Instead of convincing them, why not just make
systas so much obviously better that people will use it?
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-05 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-02 20:52 Threads and asyncs Marius Vollmer
2002-09-02 21:24 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-02 21:53 ` Marius Vollmer
[not found] ` <87bs7ggiss.fsf@zagadka.ping.de>
2002-09-02 22:24 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-02 23:51 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-09-02 23:02 ` Rob Browning
2002-09-02 23:24 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-02 23:36 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-02 23:52 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-03 0:57 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:13 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-03 1:29 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:31 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:00 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-03 1:28 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:23 ` RnRS process/history/documentation (was Re: Threads and asyncs) Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-03 1:27 ` Threads and asyncs Rob Browning
2002-09-03 1:45 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-03 1:48 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-04 23:46 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-05 0:20 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 1:45 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-05 2:38 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 2:30 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-05 2:43 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 2:40 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG [this message]
2002-09-05 3:00 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 2:57 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-05 3:23 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 3:14 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-05 4:00 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 3:51 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-05 4:01 ` Tom Lord
2002-09-05 22:03 ` Lynn Winebarger
2002-09-03 1:34 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-09-03 18:06 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-09-04 0:28 ` NIIBE Yutaka
2002-09-04 18:02 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-09-04 22:30 ` NIIBE Yutaka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lm6hjh0t.fsf@becket.becket.net \
--to=tb@becket.net \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=owinebar@free-expression.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).