From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Names for the C frame stuff Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:25:04 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87llofxonj.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1073784703 16889 80.91.224.253 (11 Jan 2004 01:31:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 11 02:31:38 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AfUS2-0003Ce-00 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:31:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AfVKk-0005Wm-Uq for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:28:10 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AfVJj-0005AK-SR for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:27:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AfVJD-0004zL-N8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.253.8.218] (helo=mail.dokom.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AfVJC-0004yl-VR for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:26:35 -0500 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway15.dip81.dokom.de ([195.253.15.81] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by mail.dokom.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #3) id 1AfUML-0004ar-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:25:45 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 14018 invoked by uid 1000); 11 Jan 2004 01:25:04 -0000 Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: (Neil Jerram's message of "10 Jan 2004 16:37:42 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3194 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3194 Neil Jerram writes: > In this case, it seems to me that we can usefully keep > scm_c_call_with_blocked_asyncs etc. both for back compatibility and > as examples of the use of the scm_frame_* API. (Assuming that the > implementation of scm_c_call_with_blocked_asyncs can be exactly > rewritten to use scm_frame_*.) Yes, exactly. I don't see any reason to remove scm_c_call_with_blocked_asyncs and other existing functions. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel