From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: building guile from CVS Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:03:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87llallfwc.fsf@zagadka.de> References: <873bxarzgk.fsf@zip.com.au> <200501211309.39329.bruno@clisp.org> <200501211641.38438.bruno@clisp.org> <87r7kee9rh.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1106403445 14978 80.91.229.6 (22 Jan 2005 14:17:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 14:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 22 15:17:20 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CsM4m-0002ks-00 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:17:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CsMGt-0005Ea-6u for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:29:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CsMFA-0004Kk-9l for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:28:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CsMF0-0004ET-2O for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:27:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CsMEx-0004BP-Ut for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:27:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.253.8.218] (helo=mail.dokom.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CsLrj-0003wd-Gm for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:03:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.138.43.229] (helo=zagadka.ping.de) by mail.dokom.net with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CsLri-0007zB-AK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:03:50 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 26875 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Jan 2005 14:03:48 -0000 Original-To: Bruno Haible In-Reply-To: <87r7kee9rh.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Sat, 22 Jan 2005 08:45:54 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4723 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4723 Kevin Ryde writes: > Ah, yep. A gettextize is definitely now needed in autogen.sh. > autoreconf won't run that. Hmm, we had problems in the past with running gettextize in the guile-core tree. We only wrap functions like gettext, we do not have a translation structure in place for Guile itself. Not-running gettextize is a bug-fix in autoreconf actually. Because of that fix, we need autoconf 2.59 or later. Maybe we have to run gettextize after all, but we explicitely do _not_ run it right now. See HACKING. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel