From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: dynamic argv0 relocation Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 07:49:13 +1000 Message-ID: <87ll5hx4py.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <87zmty4b0v.fsf@peder.flower> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118441567 8588 80.91.229.2 (10 Jun 2005 22:12:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys , guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 11 00:12:44 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DgrfP-0002RB-4M for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 00:07:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dgrjf-000327-82 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:12:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DgrgQ-0000gE-Mf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:08:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DgrgJ-0000dG-HO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:08:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DgrgI-0000Sv-So for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:08:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.85] (helo=mailout2.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DgrNz-0001JJ-Ip; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:49:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.86]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j5ALnOcF027447; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 07:49:25 +1000 Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2675.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.38.117]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j5ALnIh4023414; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 07:49:18 +1000 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DgrNJ-0000Zl-00; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 07:49:13 +1000 Original-To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87zmty4b0v.fsf@peder.flower> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:05:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5093 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5093 Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > > Below is an attempt that works, but I'm not sure about the api nor the > implementation. What do you think? No offence, but it sounds very dubious to me. These things are meant to be settled at the "make all" build stage. (The gnu standards have bits about that.) Incidentally, for a normal svr4 system won't you still need libguile.so in a location known to the loader? It won't be able to find it for the main guile executable otherwise. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel