From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: SRFI-88-style keywords Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:56:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87lk3fgd5u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2bc5f8210711021714t4b3c3743v7dc76a882916be42@mail.gmail.com> <8763ujng7q.fsf@gnu.org> <2bc5f8210804151130y670dab16l9dd6db0165053fc3@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208285929 29855 80.91.229.12 (15 Apr 2008 18:58:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:58:49 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 15 20:58:55 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlqM0-0003oW-Uz for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:58:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlqLM-0002Je-MD for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:57:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlqKf-0001p4-7E for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:56:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlqKe-0001oW-2t for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:56:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlqKd-0001oN-Qf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:56:39 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlqKd-0006Lr-CR for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:56:39 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JlqKb-0006ha-HN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:56:37 +0000 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:56:37 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:56:37 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 27 Germinal an 216 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Rz8B+hffY2BnWKbrapb5kvRpMkE= X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7158 Archived-At: Hi, "Julian Graham" writes: >> Now, we should do something about `cond-expand' and `require-extension'. >> For the former, we should probably look at the current value of >> `(read-options)', but that requires changing the implementation of >> `cond-expand'. For the latter, we can provide a dummy module that >> modifies `read-options' and re-export the needed procedures. >> >> Thoughts? > > Sorry, what's the context? Is it that those functions read characters > independent of the default reader? We want `cond-expand' (SRFI-0) and `require-extension' (SRFI-55) to be SRFI-88-aware if possible. See what I mean? Thanks, Ludo'.