From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:34:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87ljlqxt37.fsf@gnu.org> References: <0489FB6F-567B-4967-9703-1A3D89462A37@raeburn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250004901 6188 80.91.229.12 (11 Aug 2009 15:35:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:35:01 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 11 17:34:54 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MatNE-00024U-4D for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:34:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41872 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MatNC-0006IN-GU for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:34:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MatN5-0006HB-Rj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:34:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MatN0-0006DF-Aj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:34:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52704 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MatN0-0006DC-50 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:34:38 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:56482 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MatMz-0007jk-Gf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:34:37 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MatMs-0005Gq-SS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:34:31 +0000 Original-Received: from laptop-147-210-128-170.labri.fr ([147.210.128.170]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:34:30 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by laptop-147-210-128-170.labri.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:34:30 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: laptop-147-210-128-170.labri.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 24 Thermidor an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volutio?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?n?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:yrjxyRgeL9OYbC/WD2j+TnOgJSg= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9061 Archived-At: Ken Raeburn writes: > ../../guile-readline/../libguile/strings.h:26:21: error: uniconv.h: No > such file or directory > > Neither the path specified for libgmp nor the path specified for > libunistring at configure time is included here. Arrrrg, that's what I feared with the inclusion of libunistring headers in Guile's public headers. Mike: can you fix it one way or another? Solutions are: 1. Fix `guile.pc' to have "-I${libunistring}", and fix guile-readline CPPFLAGS as well. 2. Or just don't include in public headers. This means you have to declare, say, `scm_t_string_failed_conversion_handler' as a replacement for `iconv_ilseq_handler'. I would prefer #2 for reasons explained in another message. Thanks in advance! Ludo'.