From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] %nil-handling optimization and fixes v1 Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:58:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87ljl14d42.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> References: <20090709161043.GA2538@fibril.netris.org> <87hbvpzmsr.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251642930 14595 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2009 14:35:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 30 16:35:23 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MhlV3-0007XG-0X for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:35:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51340 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MhlAV-00085u-G8 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:14:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mhkw1-0004e4-Py for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:59:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mhkvw-0004aY-H5 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:59:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40950 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mhkvv-0004a4-Vv for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:37009) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mhkvu-0005IV-UK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-152-99-133.range86-152.btcentralplus.com [86.152.99.133]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2B31F6CA0; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:58:55 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from arudy.ossau.uklinux.net (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A6938021; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:58:53 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <87hbvpzmsr.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Fri\, 28 Aug 2009 08\:08\:57 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9210 Archived-At: Neil Jerram writes: > because if we agreed this, some of the changes would be needed, or > wouldn't be needed. :-) I think I meant to say "would be different, or wouldn't be needed". Neil