From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: fmatch Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 18:06:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87ljba7gbx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201005062239.32992.stefan.tampe@spray.se> <201005172208.00094.stefan.tampe@spray.se> <87wruvbqen.fsf@gnu.org> <201005222331.34859.stefan.tampe@spray.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274630974 28202 80.91.229.12 (23 May 2010 16:09:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 16:09:34 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 23 18:09:33 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGDk4-0001rK-P8 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 18:09:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33444 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGDk4-0007P9-1G for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 12:09:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33843 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGDhY-0006MS-2o for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 12:06:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGDhW-0003o4-5M for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 12:06:55 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:36290) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGDhV-0003nY-Vt for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 12:06:54 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGDhS-0000z7-HS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 18:06:50 +0200 Original-Received: from acces.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 May 2010 18:06:50 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by acces.bordeaux.inria.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 May 2010 18:06:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ connect(): No such file or directory Original-Lines: 32 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acces.bordeaux.inria.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 4 Prairial an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:o15eTKfvOI4O/ANpERdRfm205RU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10354 Archived-At: Hello Stefan! stefan writes: >> > On a side note I have not gotten any answer from the author of that code >> > that I modified. >> >> Hmm that’s unfortunate. > Yes, maybe ask on irc? what channel? Personal email should be OK, or you could send a message with the patch that adds support for record-matching attached (with Guile-specific parts suitably isolated with ‘cond-expand’) and Cc: guile-devel. We should make it as simple as possible for him to deal with. It could be that he’s not interested in it, which is fine. >> If we can’t get record-matching included upstream shortly, then I’d >> suggest making the addition of record-matching a separate commit in our >> repository, so we can easily find it in the future. > > Separate commit? That is: first commit the switch form Wright’s to Shinn’s match *unmodified*. Then, commit support for record-matching, separately. > Ludo, I'm relly a beginner in some respects so be patient :-) No problem! :-) Thanks, Ludo’.