From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: local-eval on syntax-local-binding, bound-identifiers Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:55:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87lip3vrda.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87sjjg7gqm.fsf@pobox.com> <87zkdo2ukg.fsf@netris.org> <87r4yzj4gu.fsf@pobox.com> <8762gb3hfv.fsf@netris.org> <87ipkbisna.fsf@pobox.com> <87wr8r1j1q.fsf@netris.org> <8739bfi5ys.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326980362 28034 80.91.229.12 (19 Jan 2012 13:39:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:39:22 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 19 14:39:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RnsCz-0002gy-3r for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:39:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49502 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RnsCy-0001CQ-8Y for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:39:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40017) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RnsCs-0001CH-J5 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:39:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RnsCr-0006CJ-DV for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:39:10 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:64480 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RnsCr-0006C1-2t for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:39:09 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79824639E for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:39:07 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=mBT1DokDAiul3h9A5JDNQgEjwpE=; b=frMj2M r1+wpHHoywehlMtK8K/p967ajIST5ZbCxBDtYfDrNO0JvnNnRCQItqixuj6NJDm2 hR4hr3FoK9ATwqOuUyCQZBR/fFOcZZ1TZA21yEn993VnOZKMOgGWpyHm2sON2Wkf U1jRXSqMco8JxtfMmlkKaB9qJgzjqjJG6yaR0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:subject :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=LaGUJezuCr5BH3o7DZWFndcdlGVevm7b hyFJMELhSdzEnXHBB7IMK8iv01fJQMJgZHx+IR134N5EecegMxXRFhakC+dzLZXr 6zHokS/24PDadx17NAmAs41r6/4d7fh8jjOzaEHaztxTdkOpBMpzIivy5SfKLqs4 3l7vm2QhalQ= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55498639B for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:39:07 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AF7D6398 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:39:06 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8739bfi5ys.fsf@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:27:07 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F576AE4A-42A2-11E1-953D-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:13585 Archived-At: On Tue 17 Jan 2012 00:27, Andy Wingo writes: > TBH I think this is the best thing we can do for local-eval. We > preserve flexibility for local-eval, make other experiments possible, > and the local-eval implementation is a bit more perspicacious, as the > scoping is more lexical (in the same file, even). "Perspicuous", rather. How embarrassing! Andy -- http://wingolog.org/