From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: our benchmark-suite Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 23:43:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87lil7bp1c.fsf@neil-laptop.ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87y5pmx0ow.fsf@pobox.com> <874ns77dh6.fsf@gnu.org> <87aa1vzhps.fsf@neil-laptop.ossau.uklinux.net> <87lilaxome.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336167823 20261 80.91.229.3 (4 May 2012 21:43:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 21:43:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 04 23:43:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SQQHs-00036X-Vu for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 23:43:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34409 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQQHs-00033d-7a for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 17:43:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49493) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQQHo-00033U-Lh for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 17:43:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQQHm-0001Ov-Mz for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 17:43:36 -0400 Original-Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]:24359) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQQHm-0001OR-H0; Fri, 04 May 2012 17:43:34 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAGRMpE9OlXc8/2dsb2JhbABFFrJUgQiCCQEBBAE6HCMQCAMhJQ8BBCWIPwm7MJENBJcPijGFAIJq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,533,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="385014776" Original-Received: from host-78-149-119-60.as13285.net (HELO arudy) ([78.149.119.60]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 04 May 2012 22:43:31 +0100 Original-Received: from neil-laptop.ossau.uklinux.net.ossau.homelinux.net (AToulouse-158-1-42-211.w90-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.50.73.211]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 814DC380C4; Fri, 4 May 2012 22:43:29 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <87lilaxome.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 02 May 2012 23:24:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 62.24.128.239 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14346 Archived-At: >> For http://ossau.homelinux.net/~neil I do still have all of the raw data >> including iteration counts, so I could easily implement dividing by the >> iteration count, and hence allow for future iteration count changes. >> >> Is there any downside from doing that? (I don't think so.) > > No, I guess. And as you show, having raw data instead of synthesized > figures gives more freedom. It turns out I'm already scaling by iteration count - in fact since November 2009. :-) Still, I wanted to do something new, so I've added further graphs showing just the last 50 measurements for each benchmark (whereas the existing graphs showed all measurements since my data collection began). The generation of those is still running at the moment, but should be complete in an hour or so. Regards, Neil