From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: features.h in wip-rtl Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:46:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87lijrqyjo.fsf@pobox.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339584437 32036 80.91.229.3 (13 Jun 2012 10:47:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 13 12:47:13 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sel6U-0005ER-5p for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:47:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54010 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sel6U-0002y8-5Z for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33928) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sel6Q-0002y1-Rf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:47:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sel6K-0007J3-6h for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:54440 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sel6J-0007Fz-V9 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:47:00 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3F2A8B8; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:46:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=I2SzvDIwYvr8rB8/mpzqVdNlPgY=; b=VcxEmn MNCCWaiCUfZSs+eeglOGjrw40D+84tHf5YFnhAmAUK50SoerUxo/K3uV/EN+DUZT 9tcIfaCBqpOZ9AAWFQZjTqE4w97F9oG1cy4AeqMAfXPcRQWhIm/6qdCEk7QWYz85 p3fIjqSplNB4U5ux2sMVcw5TPWNTJh8wR8XCY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=GpchXcFUeeOSUT/e2716emRd1W583Wkr hByQIQyKITtmXEsBoOqyDqECrTNOMx8a1aEaV4YNdKA5HWuOWWre2kBQN16uJj3U Lko62JzXD3pF8N3XcfCTjE87rz34m03BJ5WpeOzvDSOda/xaf6REbaq7jvKTSbgK 8dTtvh43i/w= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5661DA8B7; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:46:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [80.102.223.209]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9305A8B6; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:46:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Noah Lavine's message of "Tue, 12 Jun 2012 23:39:40 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 16DFA02C-B545-11E1-A5D2-8DF2579FE65A-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14617 Archived-At: On Wed 13 Jun 2012 05:39, Noah Lavine writes: > I've hit a problem building a recent wip-rtl. It now includes the file > libguile/elf.h, which does "#include ". I'm building Guile > on Mac OS X, and I think that doesn't have features.h, so the build > breaks. However, I don't see any uses of feature.h in elf.h - in > particular, there aren't any ifdef's. Can we take out that inclusion? Yes, we can take it out. I meant to do so but forgot! Andy -- http://wingolog.org/