From: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
To: Lizzie Dixon <_@lizzie.io>
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Guile security vulnerability w/ listening on localhost + port (with fix)
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 10:05:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lgxo9vx8.fsf@dustycloud.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161014215551.GA31883@lizzie.io>
Lizzie Dixon writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/11, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
>> The default in Guile has been to expose a port over localhost to which
>> code may be passed. The assumption for this is that only a local user
>> may write to localhost, so it should be safe. Unfortunately, users
>> simultaneously developing Guile and operating modern browsers are
>> vulnerable to a combination of an html form protocol attack [1] and a
>> DNS rebinding attack [2]. How to combine these attacks is published in
>> the article "How to steal any developer's local database" [3].
>
>>
>> In Guile's case, the general idea is that you visit some site which
>> presumably loads some javascript code (or tricks the developer into
>> pressing a button which performs a POST), and the site operator switches
>> the DNS from their own IP to 127.0.0.1. Then a POST is done from the
>> website to 127.0.0.1 with the body containing scheme code. This code is
>> then executed by the Guile interpreter on the listening port.
>
> You don't need to rebind DNS to exploit this bug, or other bugs like
> it. I wrote some details here:
>
> <https://blog.lizzie.io/exploiting-CVE-2016-8606.html>
>
> Best,
>
> Lizzie.
Hi Lizzie! Thanks for the post. Interesting to see you figured out how
to do it with a GET request, not just a POST. So, I guess this will
work from a public site as well? I'm always a bit fuzzy about what
browsers do and don't allow, but I'm stunned that a browser will let a
request from some http://foo.example/ to http://localhost:37146/, even
for just a GET. It seems like there are all sorts of daemons you can
exploit that way.
Anyway, thanks for the interesting blogpost, and kudos for using Guile
to write your example!
- Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-16 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-11 14:01 Guile security vulnerability w/ listening on localhost + port (with fix) Christopher Allan Webber
2016-10-12 15:49 ` Nala Ginrut
2016-10-12 16:11 ` Thompson, David
2016-10-14 21:55 ` Lizzie Dixon
2016-10-16 15:05 ` Christopher Allan Webber [this message]
2016-10-16 19:51 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2016-10-17 1:39 ` Lizzie Dixon
2017-02-26 18:22 ` Andy Wingo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lgxo9vx8.fsf@dustycloud.org \
--to=cwebber@dustycloud.org \
--cc=_@lizzie.io \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).